your opinions please

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
rickendelic
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:13 pm

your opinions please

Post by rickendelic »

I'm in the market for another rick, I have a 615 that I love, but I don't want to continue to gig with it. so, I was thinking either a 660 (which I assume is very simular to what I have with the exception of the nut width), or a 350. you know, something newer so i don't have to feel bad if it gets beat-up.

my question is, those of you with a 350 or those who've had one, what didn't you like about it, or was there anything about it that it didn't do for you? If you've had both which did you like better?

i'm really looking for something long term, that I'm really gonna gig, and i thought I'd get your educated opinions

thanks
User avatar
gregga41
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:29 am
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by gregga41 »

Hey Louis,
I have found nothing to dislike about my 350, it is a really comfortable guitar. It's a '90 Liverpool model, but i have had the pleasure of playing Aitch's vast collection of 350v63's, in all colors, no complaints with any of them. Also have sampled the 350SH.....yummmm! :D
Best of luck with your choice. It's just a matter of what you feel suits you.
User avatar
rickendelic
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:13 pm

Re: your opinions please

Post by rickendelic »

I know It's all subjective, I was just wondering if there was anything that stuck out for anybody. you know how sometimes you don't realize an issue till after you've had something for a while?... that's basically what I was looking for.

thanks again,

Louis
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by beatlefreak »

Consider a 650 - A great, all-around guitar. The humbuckers sound great, and it has a different feel than other Ricks.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by kiramdear »

I love the smaller body style of the 350. Comfortable in close quarters and easier to carry it around and move onstage without banging it into stuff. Also it sits comfortably in one's lap for long spells at home. Can't really say anything bad about the styling, it's just less matronly looking than the bigger sisters. F-holes are optional. They are lean, mean guitar bodies. Well balanced too.

I have a 320, same style body but with short scale. For me that makes playing and handling even that much easier.

You did say that new guitar was going to be jetglo, didn't you :mrgreen: :lol:
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by ozover50 »

I certainly have no issues with any of my 350v63s. Smaller body, lightweight and a great sound from the toasters. I'm also very comfortable with my 620 although it's a tad heavier.
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
grazioso
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1076
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by grazioso »

if you like 615 a lot... i would try 610 or 450 or one of the modern ones like 650xx all without binding on top. next i'd try 330 and 350xx and 360. 660/620 feel different due to the tops being bound and therefore bit sharper on the edge....
dusan palka who is also known as grazioso on infamous auction web site
if you want to reach the man and expect an answer please make sure you remove this email address ([email protected]) from your spam block if you have one.
User avatar
4003
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 5:00 am

Re: your opinions please

Post by 4003 »

beatlefreak wrote:Consider a 650 - A great, all-around guitar. The humbuckers sound great, and it has a different feel than other Ricks.
I agree with Kris. The 650 is very versatile and the wider neck is good for my hands. I sold my 620 several years ago and bought the 650. I do like it better.
Attachments
IMGP0561.JPG
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by paologregorio »

I'd love to have a 350 and give it the SH body style treatment, but with all toasters, rather than a bridge HB; I haven't had any success with those. I'd probably go one step further and have a faux "slash(don't laugh Scotty!)/cat's eye" soundhole painted on; a real sound hole would make the guitar slightly more prone to squealing feedback, which I'd prefer to avoid! :D
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: your opinions please

Post by jingle_jangle »

Paul, you won't see a big difference in the guitar's tendency to feedback, as the body's construction does not allow for a whole lot of interior space, and the thickness of the top and back coupled with the pickup locations on the rigid center section--which in itself is rather short and wide--lend the construction a stiffness that discourage sympathetic vibration. So a painted-on soundhole might be overthink and overkill.
User avatar
scoobster28
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm

Re: your opinions please

Post by scoobster28 »

I like the 325 series guitars, and the 350 plays all right too. However, for a guy who isn't the thinnest in the world I don't like the 350 because it is smaller, and thus I appear larger. And not in a good way!
laplacian
New member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: your opinions please

Post by laplacian »

I'll add: I had a 615 and sold it , then bought a 660 to "replace" it. Not the same by a mile. It was '67 615 and a '07 660. The modern 660 feels much better, and the nut is way beetre IMHO, but the sound clearly went to the 615. I have major regrets. I think is the old 60's pups vs new scatterwounds. So be wary when you make that call.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”